Re: [APML] Hypering RG200 (was: new post)

[Aplanatic@aol.com]

Jim:

One data point:  I hypered a roll of RG200 in the canister for 2.5 hours/50C/standard Lumicon instructions/hand pump.  There was no noticable change in the "rebate" between this and unhypered film.  Film response was poor.  A one hour exposure at f/5.6 (80 mm F.L/dark skies/Nikon camera on tracking mount) was underexposed.  My tentative conclusion is that the film is not well hypered "in the can" with above schedule.  Next time I will try 5 hours.

As always with hypering, YMMV.

Dave Rowe



--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>