[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] another film question



I mentioned awhile back that my experience was it had very low color sensitivity. I think most would agree to stay away from Fuji for now. The old 400 and 800 Superia was good but this 4th layer stuff is bad.
 
WK
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:11 PM
Subject: [APML] another film question

The fellow at the local photoshop who does my astro prints and scans to CD
gave me a couple rolls of Fuji 1600 saying he had found it not to be too
grainy. Although he understands the topic of reciprocity, he really hasn't
any experience with this film on long exposures.

I plan on trying the film from my back yard rather than on one of my few
opportunities at a dark site. Is there anyone out there who has direct
experience with having tried this film for long 45-60 minute) astro exposures?

Steve


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>