[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APML] Pentax 67 purge port........NOT!<g>
>It would be nice to avoid bringing a high pressure cylinder of N2 along.
>The air is so dry one sees a graphic example of why to wind the film slowly
>in the camera or risk a 'lighting streak' on the film. When I was digging
>into
>a plastic bag, I saw many flashes of electrical discharge from the static.
Tim,
That illustrates the dryness of the air more clearly than anything. I
don't think I've ever had a static discharge from film handling - the air
just has too much moisture in it, even at my southern France site. With
that sort of air dryness I don't think you will see any real gain from
using an N2 purge. There is still the O2 question, but in my experience it
is the H2O that matters most.
--Philip
Philip Perkins - philip@astrocruise.com
Wiltshire UK & Luberon France
Astrocruise - http://www.astrocruise.com
-- APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/> ---
Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>