Re:[APML] M33 Shot

["Steve Lindsey" <stevelindsey@earthlink.net>]

That's good news!  Guess I might give LE400 (supposedly the same
as PJ400) another try and extend my exposure times.  I've been
shooting 45 min at f7.5 with my 10" SCT.  M33 was almost non-existent
on the neg from my last outing.

Steve

>--- Original Message ---

Hi Steve,
>    Yes it was Unhypered PJ400
>
>Jim Ives
> http://flyboy999.freeyellow.com
> flyboy@bignet.net
>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>  From: Steve Lindsey 
>  To: astro-photo@seds.org 
>  Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:23 AM
>  Subject: Re: [APML] M33 Shot
>
>
>  Jim,
>
>  Had to ask given the ongoing discussion on films...  Was your
shot 
>with unhypered PJ400?  You picked up a lot of detail for f10
so the long 
>exposure times apparently really paid off.
>
>  Steve
>    ----- Original Message ----- 
>
>    I finally have what I think is a successful Galaxy shot!
It's a 
>stack of 2 1 1/2 hr shots at f/10 with my Meade 8" SCT. I've
tried for a 
>long time (about a year to the month!) to get one I consider
is pretty 
>good and I think this one turned out ok. As always Constructive

>criticism is very welcome! 
>http://flyboy999.freeyellow.com/Galxies/index11.htm  
>
>    Jim Ives
>
>




--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>