RE: [APML] LE400 (was: Unhypered Print Film)

["Steve Lindsey" <stevelindsey@earthlink.net>]

Matt,

I posted this a few days ago and all I got was one response with
a recommendation to try a different film.  The details of my
latest 4 shots a linked as NEW on my webpage.  Maybe you can
recommend something I missed like longer exposure times?  Take
a look:

www.geocities.com/stevelindsey2001/

Thanks.

Steve

>--- Original Message ---

>Steve,
>
>Why was LE400 awful?
>
>What were the parameters? Object, Exposure, F-stop, Telescope
model, Conditions: transparency, seeing, LVM 6.7, temperature,
humidity, Processing: scanner, etc. Can you give us a link to
the image?





--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>