[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APML] Kodachrome 200?
Why cold camera? Just wait for one of those crisp -40 January nights in
Calgary and shoot widefield with your 35mm.
George Anderson
Montreal Canada
Clear skies and good health
> "John C. Mirtle" wrote:
>
> Keith,
> Many years ago - just after Kodachrome 200 came out - I saw a
> presentation of images with it taken by Terence Dickinson. They were
> vividly purple and lacking in faint detail. It showed high reciprocity
> failure and was generally poor in performance. Not recommended.
> However, as you have shot it under colder conditions, it may work
> better than the summer conditions Terence shot it under. I look
> forward to your results - perhaps my cold camera isn't ready for a
> museum quite yet..... :-)
>
> John Mirtle
> Calgary, Ab. Canada
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Keith Geary
> To: astro-photo@seds.org
> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:07 PM
> Subject: [APML] Kodachrome 200?
>
> Hello all, could I pose a question?, I've just had a super
> weekend photographing regions of the Winter Milkyway, but I
> took a chance on using
> a film called Kodachrome 200 colour slide film. I've never
> used this film before, and I was wondering have any of you
> used it. I've sent it away for processing today, but don't
> know what to expect. Anybody have any experience with
> this??
>
> Thanks, Keith...
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo