Re: [APML] Stacking film images

["Bradley Hope" <bradley@thorngarden.net>]

Thanks, Roland. I glanced at them quickly and have bookmarked them for
downloading tomorrow so I can give them a try (Picture Window for now,
Registar when I get all my new toys the end of this week and can start
learning deep sky imaging). I  already have ImagesPlus on the way, so, maybe
I'll end up with a nice suite of processing software soon.

Thank you, again.

Bradley

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roland Roberts" <roland@astrofoto.org>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: [APML] Stacking film images


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> I think AstroStack and Registax both have fairly low limits for image
> size, at least low compared to film scans that are near the grain
> limit.  Both are really designed for use with webcam generated images.
>
> Picture Window Pro and RegiStar are the only two I have used for film
> images.  The former I've used for stacking lunar images, the latter
> for star fields because it is *so* easy to do....
>
> roland
> - -- 
>        PGP Key ID: 66 BC 3B CD
> Roland B. Roberts, PhD                             RL Enterprises
> roland@rlenter.com                            6818 Madeline Court
> roland@astrofoto.org                           Brooklyn, NY 11220
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.3ia
> Charset: noconv
> Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
>
> iQCVAwUBP7hFIeoW38lmvDvNAQFnYwP+NaV0845jcrsQxgLvEUWdLEC6ac/je+UO
> bioauPyX2Pqt/7FoPmQsKoLAQpgVdaFrC/eq74VxzxHtDd4Uh7DkcQNNx3fWiEU/
> yA95yutgbYLAYiHmOebBtkgXyw61k+nUPXacfSgd1fm09eXDRs1K+hMJCh8xaQtM
> X3aNq8wILqA=
> =kUe7
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo