[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] Stupid Stacking Question



Thom,
 
No stupid questions, that's how we learn.  Lord knows I've gained much from this group, so let me see if I can help.
The answer to your question is obvious when we examine just what is this stacking process.  When we 'stack' images we are applying some mathmatical function to the pixels of each image in the stack.  Typically pixels at the same relative coordinates are averaged or added.  Now I think the answer to your question becomes clear.  If you average the same value for any sample size you get the same number.  Also if you add the same relative values to themselves the values will increase, but will do so proportionately and will not give any better signal to noise ratio and will likely end up clipping on the white end.
But lets look at what happens when we 'stack' using different images of the same subject.  When the relative pixels are averaged, say, the pixels of our subject are more consistent than the backrouund noise and tend to clean up.  The result is better signal to noise ratio.
 
Jerry does a much better job of explaining this on his website along with a scientific study of various stacking techniques:  http://www.astropix.com
 
Carpe Noctem,  Frank
 
Astropix:  http://bellsouthpwp.net/f/r/frankb02/astropix.html
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 6:27 AM
Subject: [APML] Stupid Stacking Question

Hey all, I understand the advantages of stacking when combining say a CCD frame or TP with color film and even a blue sensitive film with a red one,but in many people galleries I see stacks of the same exposure time with the same film.  I understand how this adds depth and detail, but couldn't this be done with multiple copies of the same picture?
 
This thought was prompted by the 201XT discussion as I do my guiding via webcam/StarTrack (limited star magnitude) or manually (limited attention span /ergonomic issues) so I am looking  at stacking as the "short exposures" best friend.
 
Thanks in advance,
 
Thom Iwancio
Elgin, SC
www.machunter.org