Re: [APML] E200 and Super HQ100

[Stephen Pitt <lthuedk@pe.net>]

Since we're into slow films, here's a link comparing Kodak Elitechrome 
II and Provia 100f:

http://www.light-to-dark.com/K200_P100F.html

Stephen

Jim Ives wrote:

> Yes thanks Mike! I'll be watchig for results from you guys too.
>     Thanks for the tip about the E200 Steve! May have saved me a 
> wasted night!
> Jim
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: Mike & Dianna <mailto:galaxy@ncweb.com>
>     To: astro-photo@seds.org <mailto:astro-photo@seds.org>
>     Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 6:31 AM
>     Subject: Re: [APML] E200 and Super HQ100
>
>     Jim,
>      
>     Last year I experimented with unhypered HQ100 with an 8" F3.5
>     newtonian. The films color looked great but seemed to stop
>     recording at apx. 45 minutes. I took two shots of M31 and noticed
>     no difference in what the film recorded at 45 and 75 minutes. If
>     memeroy serves me right, conditions were actually good that night
>     for AP, seeing was great and humidity was lower than normal. The
>     film was N2 purged also during the exposures. This is the only
>     test I ve done with it unhypered. I have a roll hypered ready to
>     go, but the weather doesnt look good here for awhile. I am very
>     curious to see how HQ100 hypered works with my system. Hopefully soon.
>     Ive never used E200, so I cant say anything about that.
>     Hope this helps some.
>      
>     Mike Leitch
>     galaxy@ncweb.com <mailto:galaxy@ncweb.com>
>     Astrophotography website
>     www.ncweb.com/~galaxy/home/astropho.htm
>     <http://www.ncweb.com/%7Egalaxy/home/astropho.htm>
>
>         ----- Original Message -----
>         From: Jim Ives <mailto:flyboy9990@earthlink.net>
>         To: APML <mailto:astro-photo@seds.org>
>         Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 4:32 PM
>         Subject: [APML] E200 and Super HQ100
>
>         Can E200 and Super HQ100 be shot WITHOUT hypering?  It's my
>         understanding that Super HQ100 benefits from 1hr at 50Cand
>         +3PSI but are these 2 films ok to shoot unhypered?
>          
>         Thanks!
>         Jim Ives
>



--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>