RE: [APML] SS4000 Questions

[Alan Voetsch <critter12952@yahoo.com>]

Hi Jon,

--- Jon Kolb <jkolb@datawest.net> wrote:
> That's about the size you get when you scan raw at
> 4000 DPI.  If you
> make corrections in the Polacolor software and "scan
> and correct,"
> you'll get a file half that size.  I think it's
> still better to scan
> raw.  To handle the larger files, it's really a
> simple matter of
> upgrading the RAM on your computer, especially since
> memory is cheap
> these days. 

I would have sworn that most of the other scans were
in the 23mb size range. Anyway, what I've decided to
do (because everyone seems to do things differently),
is to scan some both ways (raw and corrected), work
with them and see what happens.

I think also that my computer is rammed to the max.
There are only 2 expansion slots and I've filled them
with 256mb chips.

Thanks,
Alan

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus – Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>