[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] Portra 400 UC

To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Subject: Re: [APML] Portra 400 UC
From: "westergren" <westergren@netzero.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 18:33:19 -0800
References: <005801c28493$6f5510e0$31843f42@mpd> <5.1.0.14.0.20021105041027.02dc4930@pop3.norton.antivirus>
Reply-To: astro-photo@seds.org
Sender: owner-astro-photo@seds.org

Matt,

I tried Portra VC 400 when it first came out and I got terrible results on
actual astrophotos.  I have no experience with Portra UC.  If anyone
indicates that it may work, I will lab test it up to 4-1/2 hours and give
you all an evaluation.  I presume that you are shooting 120/220 roll film.
I can test that size too (and 35 mm).

Don

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt BenDaniel" <matt@starmatt.com>


> Has anyone tried the new Portra 400 UC film for deep sky?
> How is its red sensitivity?
> Is it similar to Supra 400?
> --
> Matt BenDaniel




--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [APML] Portra 400 UC
  - From: Matt BenDaniel <matt@starmatt.com>

References:
- Re: [APML] Speeding up film with cold weather
  - From: "westergren" <westergren@netzero.net>
- [APML] Portra 400 UC
  - From: Matt BenDaniel <matt@starmatt.com>

Prev by Author: Re: [APML] Speeding up film with cold weather
Next by Author: Re: [APML] Fuji HQ100 film tests - the Results
Prev by thread: Re: [APML] Portra 400 UC
Next by thread: Re: [APML] Portra 400 UC
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread