[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] hypering and blank film



I'll have to answer your question with a question.  Is the film clear as if
it has not been exposed?

If it is, then you did what many of us have, taken a one hour photo for
1/125 of a second.  A real "Murphy"

But to answer your hypering question.  If you had over hypered or over
heated your film it would be very dark and would have shown some indication
of an image.  The hyper process is heat intensive to the film so hyper
damage will result in darkening of the emulsion but it will still react to
light.

Jim

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Jones" <ajonesmis@yahoo.com>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: [APML] hypering and blank film


>
> --- Matt BenDaniel <matt@starmatt.com> wrote:
>
> > What exposure setting did you use?
> Wellllll without looking at the camera, I'll say I
> intended to use "B", however now you've got me
> concerned.  Geez will I feel stupid if I spent 4 hours
> taking exposures at 1/125!  I'd give up AP and start
> needlepoint.  I'll check tonight but if I did do
> something like that I'm not going to admit it! :)
>
> Is the answer to my question about hypering that
> there's nothing you can do in the hypering process to
> cause the film to not record any image at all, even in
> 45min?
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Find a job, post your resume.
> http://careers.yahoo.com
>
> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>