RE: [APML] RG200+SHQ100 Composite Posted

[Jerry Lodriguss <jml@astropix.com>]

>
> > But someday we all gotta convert you to Photoshop! ;o)
>
>I wouldn't rule that out.  So far, Sean's AV technique is the only thing I
>haven't been able to duplicate in PW.  I'm going to try Jerry's technique
>for the core of M42 this winter, and if that doesn't work out in PW, then I
>might switch.  I've got to admit though, that PW is pretty darn powerful for
>1/6 the cost of PS, and with a much, much simpler user interface.  I think
>if it had come out before PS, the inertia might be opposite of what it is
>today for astrophotography purposes.  Of course, PS offers some other things
>I would like to have, but I'm not sure they are worth the extra cost.


Hi Jon,

Don't be in such a hurry to spend all that money.  Lately I've found myself 
being really aggravated at the things that Photoshop can't do in 16 bit 
depth that Picture Window can do.

Jerry

Astrophotography, Tips and Techniques
for Digital Enhancement in Photoshop:
http://www.astropix.com

--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>