[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
RE: [APML] (It doesn't have to be) Goodbye
I agree with Robert and others. I have just had my first night out with my
Nikon 995 and TV Radian eyepiece adapters on the 130EDT and it was fun.
Still have to work out some things. I am very encouraged by the tone of
this discussion. I can speak for myself in that I am open to new ideas that
bring out the true beauty of celestial objects. APML is an unbelievable
resource. I appreciate this group very much.
Jeff Ball
> I'll chime in here too to agree. The divisions in imaging are getting
> seriously blurred. I have a stake in film imaging of course
> because I wrote
> Wide-Field Astrophotography. But what can I say? Today I am
> shopping for a
> 3 megapixel camera to addapt for lunar and planetary work. (of
> course, this
> is under the guise of a family Christmas gift that my wife will use
> terrestrially <G!>)
-- APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/> ---
Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>