Re: [APML] E200

[Scott Justis <ngc2683@yahoo.com>]

Hi Rick,

--- Rick Thurmond <thurmond@saber.net> wrote:
> Do others find like I do that E200 is nearly immune
> to light pollution?  
> I've taken 3 hour exposures at f/7 and I can barely
> see the edge of the 
> exposure, and that isn't under super-dark skies. 
> Same exposure on 
> NPH-400 would have shown lots of light pollution and
> less of the nebula 
> I'm interested in.
> 
> Also, is there anyone else doing darkroom work to
> print from their 
> film?  Or has scanning entirely replaced chemicals?

Since I'm primarily a Tech Pan user, I can't answer
your first question, but I stopped doing darkroom
work a couple of years ago. (sold my entire darkroom)

I am using a Polariod SprintScan 4000 scanner which
is well matched to the fine grain of Tech Pan. For
the occasional print, I use an Epson 1270 inkjet
printer. Most of the people on this list are probably 
doing the same.<g>

Scott 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com

--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>