RE: [APML] Guiding (was M101)

["Scott Hammonds" <shammonds@creatorsview.com>]

 Steve,
The Fl of the NP101 is 540mm. I'll get back to you on the private note a
little later. Have a good one.
Scott


Scott Hammonds
www.creatorsview.com

-----Original Message-----
From: astro-photo-bounces@seds.org [mailto:astro-photo-bounces@seds.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Lindsey
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 9:57 PM
To: Discussion of Film Astrophotography
Subject: Re: [APML] Guiding (was M101)

Scott,

What's the fl of your TV101NP?  I thought it was considerably less than my
TEC which may accomodate guiding with the small BORG.  Mine is 980mm and the
TV85 I guide with is at about 600.  BTW when I have my G11 set up right I'm
getting about 0.2 to 0.3 pixel average errors which corresponds I believe to
about A1's in ST4 speak (which is better than I've ever done guiding an SCT
for sure!).

Steve

----- Original Message ----- 
> Greg, Steve,
> I am using the Mini Borg 60mm with my ST4 and it seems to like it a 
> lot. I haven't had any problems using it the last few times out since 
> I made the switch. It's light and very compact, the main reason I made 
> the switch to keep my AP400GTO from overloading. Since I moved to the 
> larger AP mount it still working great, A0's and A1's.
>
>
> Scott Hammonds
> www.creatorsview.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: astro-photo-bounces@seds.org 
> [mailto:astro-photo-bounces@seds.org]
> On
> Behalf Of Greg Hartke
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 7:01 PM
> To: Steve Lindsey; Discussion of Film Astrophotography
> Subject: Re: [APML] Guiding (was M101)
>
> Hi, Steve,
>
> I've been imaging with my 152 mm f/7 refractor so the focal length is 
> 1064 mm. I think the focal length with the Mini Borg is adequate for 
> most imaging applications with the STV but I'm not so sure about the 
> ST-4. Then again, with the 60 mm and a 300 mm focal length (I think 
> it's f/5, too), that might work with the ST-4. I used to know how well 
> the ST-4 performed its centroiding computation but I lost those 
> figures when I my old computer died. (D'oh.) Let's think a second... 
> At 300 mm focal length, the image scale is (to lowest order) 0.0033 
> radians per millimeter. Let's assume a pixel size of 7.4 microns = 
> 0.0074 mm. This says that one pixel corresponds to to an angle of 2.47 
> radians = 0.001413 degrees = 5 arcseconds at the focal plane. If the 
> centroiding is performed to 1/5th of a pixel (a reasonable and, I 
> think, slightly pessimistic guess), then you'll get something like 1 
> arcsecond guiding accuracy. Hmm. Might be marginal.
> Everyone I've noticed going the compact guidescope route these days 
> has been using an STV. Has anyone here tried guiding with an ST-4 at 
> something like 300 mm focal length?
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Lindsey" <stevelindsey@earthlink.net>
> To: "Discussion of Film Astrophotography" <astro-photo@seds.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 6:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [APML] Guiding (was M101)
>
>
>> Greg,
>>
>> I thought of getting a 60mm BORG for guiding but thought the focal 
>> length with an ST4 was getting low for imaging at 980mm with my TEC.  
>> What fl do you image at guiding with the BORG/STV combo?
>>
>> Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
> 


_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo




_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo