Re: [APML] Supra 400 Reciprocity

["Steve Lindsey" <stevelindsey@earthlink.net>]

Exactly Alan.  Seems 9 out of 10 times I don't get past 120 min on a shot
without something messing it up.  Of course the probability of mess ups goes
up exponentially with exposure time...  I think I made it 150 min. once or
twice.  Too bad about your shot.

Steve


> Hey Steve,
>
> --- Steve Lindsey <stevelindsey@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > That's amazing about your Bubble story Alan!  Did you post the image?
> >  I'd like to see that one.
>
> A couple things like a dewed up corrector and field rotation kept it
> from being any kind of decent photo. A few thought I was crazy that a
> film would keep soaking up photons for that long. But, I also did
> exposures ranging from 60 minutes to 4 hours and the fact is that there
> were noticably more stars in the 5 1/2 hour shot that even the 4 hour
> shot
>
> I think at that time I may have uploaded the shot, But I did post about
> my results for sure and encouraged any Supra users to not be afraid and
> push that film as hard as you dared. It has always impressed me with
> it's colossal staying power.
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2'
> http://movies.yahoo.com/showtimes/movie?mid=1808405861
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
>


_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo