Re: [APML] What is the Best Current Film of Choice for Comets

["Steve Walters" <s-walters@comcast.net>]

ah, I see I didn't read the entire subject line! Yes, for comets E200
wouldn't be my first choice either.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roland Roberts" <roland@astrofoto.org>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: [APML] What is the Best Current Film of Choice for Comets


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> >>>>> "Steve" == Steve Walters <s-walters@comcast.net> writes:
>
>     Steve> What happened to E200?
>
> There's nothing wrong with E200, but the extra red sensitivity doesn't
> do anything for you with comets.
>
> I would pick Supra 400 as well, in part because of the extra lattitude
> that print film usually has compared with slide film.  In fact, I
> *did* pick it for yesterday morning, but it looks like all I captured
> was haze and humidity illuminated by local city lights....
>
> roland
> - -- 
>                        PGP Key ID: 66 BC 3B CD
> Roland B. Roberts, PhD                             RL Enterprises
> roland@rlenter.com                            6818 Madeline Court
> roland@astrofoto.org                           Brooklyn, NY 11220
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.3ia
> Charset: noconv
> Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
>
> iQCVAwUBQJjmROoW38lmvDvNAQHlHgP+NV4bzdeYbjWERYxwwsYr4/MD34D0BjJG
> vl1JyTPI2Hd+gJ2+rDoDfc23rp4+oqS/zCqsHW3e8IgrPvc+AN4B4doxh4r0QOgY
> vM0Or/Zc9kDYSll2UONus5U3oLeUI6tgniWMesAlAjlTQMycpzbMsUUuot3CUZal
> AV7vW06bEGA=
> =hNte
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
>


_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo