Re: [APML] Rho & M8M20

[steve banbury <banburys@sonic.net>]

Hi Steve--I appreciate your advice. Between you and Jon coaching me, maybe I'll
catch something on film. I think I'll go with no push or 1 push at the most.

Now if it just doesn't rain!

By the way--take a look at Jon's site--you'll be drooling over all his fantastic
shots. He and Tony Hallas have some of the most impressive Rho shots I've ever
seen!!

Stuffing the car--why does everything have to be soooo heavy?!!

:^} Steve

Steve Lindsey wrote:

> Thanks a lot Steve.  The sky didn't seem as dark Fri night when I took the
> shot as Sat. and I'm not that good of a judge on sky fog etc.  All I know is
> the raw scan was very bright, very vignetted and took a lot of work to get
> it that good.  If I tried it again at a good dark site I might back off to 1
> push and take 2 at about 30 to 40 min or stop down a setting and keep it
> longer.  Thanks again!
>
> Steve
>
> > Hi Steve--just wanted to say thanks for posting your Rho shot.
> > I am hoping to try it tomorrow night with the Provia 400F, and
> > your exposure data is a big hint.  I didn't realize the Provia needed a 2
> stop
> > push process!  The data on Jon Kolb's shot didn't indicate any push
> processing
> > was necessary. Maybe thats why so many people complain about trying this
> region
> > and not capturing much nebulosity?
> >
> > Thanks again for your post. If I get results even remotely as nice as
> yours
> > I'll consider my trip a success!!
> >
> > Take care--Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo