[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
RE: [APML] Pentax 67 300mm EDIF
Jens,
I said, "more" reasonable, not "reasonable" ;) As if this hobby wasn't
expensive enough, eh?
Sincerely,
Jon Kolb
Adventures in Astrophotography
http://home.datawest.net/jkolb/
jkolb@datawest.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: astro-photo-bounces@seds.org
> [mailto:astro-photo-bounces@seds.org] On Behalf Of Jens
> Christian Sorensen, D.C.
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 1:57 PM
> To: 'Discussion of Film Astrophotography'
> Subject: RE: [APML] Pentax 67 300mm EDIF
>
>
> What is affordable?
>
> When you find one - or two, let me know! Thank you.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Jens Chr Sorensen, DC
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: astro-photo-bounces@seds.org [mailto:astro-photo-bounces@seds.org]
> En nombre de Jon Kolb
> Enviado el: viernes, 16 de mayo de 2003 22:08
> Para: astro-photo@seds.org
> Asunto: [APML] Pentax 67 300mm EDIF
>
>
> Has anyone shooting the Pentax 67 system had a chance to try
> the 300mm f/4 EDIF lens? Not the older 300mm f/4 SMC, but
> the newer ED version. I'm starting to see some of these at
> more reasonable prices on the used market and wondered if the
> lens is significantly better than the older version.
>
> Sincerely,
> Jon Kolb
> Adventures in Astrophotography
> http://home.datawest.net/jkolb/
> jkolb@datawest.net
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
>
_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo