Re: [APML] Another TP Shot from New Mexico

["Jim Janusz" <jjanusz@dc.rr.com>]

John, thanks.

I agree, I like the results so well I may never use D-19 again.  I think you
identified the key difference, were scanning now and don't need that
extended contrast, we can reproduce it in the scanner or PS.

I would like to see a Schmidt shot of S147 in HC 110.

Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "John C. Mirtle" <jmirtle@shaw.ca>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:41 PM
Subject: Re: [APML] Another TP Shot from New Mexico


> Excellent Jim! You have convinced me - time to blow the dust off the
bottle
> of HC110! I am not seeing any drawback to using it over D19 with your
> images. Perhaps D19 was the best developer when making prints from tech
pan,
> but it looks like HC might be a better choice when making scans. Except,
> perhaps when shooting stuff like S147 and Sh2-216.
>
> John Mirtle
> Calgary, Ab. Canada
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Janusz" <jjanusz@dc.rr.com>
> To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:20 PM
> Subject: [APML] Another TP Shot from New Mexico
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Here is another HC 110 Dil. B processed shot of M8 and M20 area.  It's a
> PW
> > density mask blend of  60 and 30 minute shots.
> >
> > http://www.astroimager.net/Page-180-44.html
> >
> > Comments welcome as usual.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > Astronomy  Web Page at:
> > http://www.astroimager.net/
> >
> >
> > --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
> >              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
>
>
> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>