Re: [APML] New Images M13,M51,M94,M101

["wasshuberm" <wasshuber@inode.at>]

Hi Bill !

Thanks for your mail. Yes, the M13 shot is made of two images. One 120 min
and the other 20 min, masked in for the core region. The VC200L is a
classical Cassegrain with fixed mirror, build in field flattener and focuser
like a refractor. I have a reducer to f/6.3 for this sope too, but not tried
out up to now.
M51 and M101 could need more exposure time. Thats the sad thing about f/9
and film ;-(

Manfred

----- Original Message -----
From: "William R. Mattil" <wrmattil@ix.netcom.com>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: [APML] New Images M13,M51,M94,M101


> > wasshuberm wrote:
> >
> > Hi all !
> >
> > I just put some new images to my homepage. All done with my VC200L
> > from VIXEN at f/9, with Kodak E200. Those are my first galaxy attempts
> > with that scope.
> >
> > http://www.inode.at/wasshuber/gallery/m13-2.htm
> > http://www.inode.at/wasshuber/gallery/m51-1.htm
> > http://www.inode.at/wasshuber/gallery/m94-1.htm
> > http://www.inode.at/wasshuber/gallery/m101-1.htm
> >
>
> Hi Manfred,
>
> I really liked the image of M13. Am I correct that it is a composite
> image of two ?? One @ 120 minutes and one at 20 minutes ??? Also IIRC
> the VC200L is a Classical Cassegrain ? I saw one in a recent Vixen
> Catalog and am interested in this OTA. Seems pretty cost effective. Also
> .. good color in M51 but somewhat lacking in depth ?
>
> Thanks for sharing !
>
> Regards
>
> Bill
>
> --
> William R. Mattil | Fred Astaire wasn't so great.
> wrmattil@ix.netcom.com | Ginger had to do it all backwards
> (972) 399-4106 | and... in high heels.
>
> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>