[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] Benefits of Registar?

To: astro-photo@seds.org
Subject: Re: [APML] Benefits of Registar?
From: Matt BenDaniel <matt@starmatt.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 22:53:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <002f01c201d6$3ae28cb0$0100a8c0@gw2k1500>
Reply-To: astro-photo@seds.org
Sender: owner-astro-photo@seds.org

At 05:18 PM 5/22/2002 -0400, Kevin Wigell wrote:
><http://home.twcny.rr.com/kevinwigell/images/M51b.jpg>http://home.twcny.rr.com/kevinwigell/images/M51b.jpg (I told you it was no Tony or Rob). This is 90 minutes on RG200, unhypered, 10" LX200 f/10. Can I expect to get more of the faint stuff if I stack it with more similar images?

Kevin,

Your image looks pretty good. You can create a spectacular image if you hyper the RG200, use dry air purge, do four exposures 90 minutes each, and stack. 
--
Matt BenDaniel
matt@starmatt.com
http://starmatt.com


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>

References:
- [APML] Benefits of Registar?
  - From: "Kevin Wigell" <kwemail@twcny.rr.com>

Prev by Author: Re: [APML] Benefits of Registar?
Next by Author: [APML] noise [was: Benefits of Registar]
Prev by thread: Re: [APML] optimize scanning [was: noise]
Next by thread: RE: [APML] Benefits of Registar? (personal reply)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread