RE: [APML] Coal Sack & Jewel Box

["Chris Schur" <cschur@cybertrails.com>]

Matt, another superb image.  One question, you keep mentioning that slide
films are so inferior to negatives, and I agree the density range is very
different.  But then you keep posting images with slide film.  Is this
becasue of some unique color response (red for example) of the E200 that is
unmatched by negs?

Chris Schur

Astrophotography: http://www.psiaz.com/schur/astro/index.html


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-astro-photo@seds.org [mailto:owner-astro-photo@seds.org]On
Behalf Of Matt BenDaniel
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 7:16 PM
To: astro-photo@seds.org
Subject: [APML] Coal Sack & Jewel Box


http://world.std.com/~mattb/gallery/astro/coal_sack.html

I worked hard on this image, but it didn't turn out as well as I'd wanted. I
think this is an excellent example of the limitations of slide film compared
to print film. As I've said, slide film does not record stars with the same
rich color. Well, this image is pretty much all stars.

Also, there is some field rotation.

Comments welcome.

Compare with:
http://world.std.com/~mattb/gallery/astro/crux.html
--
Matt BenDaniel
matt@starmatt.com
http://starmatt.com


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>