[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML]M51 (was [APML] M101)



Mike
I'm new to this. I look at all the good images coming out of this group and
see a lot being taken with refractors. I have an 8" sct and am trying to
determin what to expect from images I will take by comparing pictures taken
by like equipment. What criteria do I use whn comparing images taken by
reflectors or by refractors? For instance is an 8" reflector comparable with
a 5" or 4" refractor?
Thanks...Larry
----------
>From: Michael Cole <mrcole@earthlink.net>
>To: astro-photo@seds.org
>Subject: Re:[APML]M51 (was [APML] M101)
>Date: Wed, May 15, 2002, 3:31 PM
>

>Larry,
>I use a six inch refractor.
>Mike
>
>Larry McManus wrote:
>
>> Very Nice...What size scope?...Larry
>>
>> on 5/15/02 11:24 AM, Michael Cole at mrcole@earthlink.net wrote:
>>
>> > Tony,
>> > You big scope guys and mosaics are taking away all the advantages of our
>> > little refractors.  You and Rob inspired me to try M51 with CCD (my
>> > third CCD picture).   Here is my attempt.  Total of over six hours
>> > imaging time.
>> > http://home.earthlink.net/~fct150/m51.htm
>> >
>> > Tony Hallas wrote:
>> >
>> >> Part 1.1    Type: Plain Text (text/plain)
>> >> Encoding: quoted-printable
>> >
>> > --
>> > Michael Cole
>> > Urban Imager Website:
>> > http://home.earthlink.net/~urbanimager
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>> > Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
>> >
>>
>> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
>
>--
>Michael Cole
>Urban Imager Website:
>http://home.earthlink.net/~urbanimager
>
>
>
>
>--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
>

--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>