[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

RE: [APML] Sky-watcher

To: astro-photo@seds.org
Subject: RE: [APML] Sky-watcher
From: "Joseph O'Neil" <joneil@multiboard.com>
Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 16:22:46 -0400
In-Reply-To: <KBEDKPGGPEMHLCJHPHKPGEFKCHAA.fmontauti@pointredtech.com>
References: <01C1F2E7.9774B5A0.a.roerig@t-online.de>
Reply-To: astro-photo@seds.org
Sender: owner-astro-photo@seds.org

At 12:40 03/05/02 -0700, you wrote:
>Is this the same scope Orion sells as Astroview rich field refractor 120/f5?
>I was also thinking to buy it but the tests are looking quite bad.

         Again, a fine, low pwoer, rich feild scope, but, IMO, even worse 
photographically than the 100mm, F5.  Dunno why, it just seems to be worse.
joe




http://www.oneilphoto.on.ca
http://www.multiboard.com/~joneil
"Una salus victus nullam sperare salutem"


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>

References:
- AW: [APML] Sky-watcher
  - From: a.roerig@t-online.de (Andreas Roerig)
- RE: [APML] Sky-watcher
  - From: "Fabrizio Montauti" <fmontauti@pointredtech.com>

Prev by Author: Re: [APML] Sky-watcher
Next by Author: Re:[APML] Cntd. What about Kodak T400CN
Prev by thread: RE: [APML] Sky-watcher
Next by thread: AW: [APML] Sky-watcher
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread