[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] NGC 3532



At 10:34 PM 4/30/2002 -0400, Mike Cook, AF9Y wrote:
>A 1200 width (Rob often
>posts 1500) would be better still, even if you increased
>the compression to retain a smaller file size.

OK, it's 1200 wide now. Now I know you'll see processing flaws.
Please do mention them, and I'll try to fix 'em.

>I know you are probably close to telling me to take
>a hike.  But we're just jealous of all those great shots
>you were able to take in Chile and expect to be

You do not know the hard work and pain involved.

>impressed to the max with LARGE images.  (Doesn't
>everyone run at least 1200 pixel wide screens)

I don't but that's another story.
--
Matt BenDaniel
matt@starmatt.com
http://starmatt.com


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>