Re: [APML] Sky & Telescope (was: Oops Astronomy Mag)

["Andy Wallace" <andywallace@home.com>]

Matt-

I suspect both of these editors have more unsolicited photos than they know
what to do with. I don't think offering to pay for more is high on their
priority list. :-)

Andy

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt BenDaniel" <matt@exceloncorp.com>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 4:52 PM
Subject: RE: [APML] Sky & Telescope (was: Oops Astronomy Mag)


> I am not trying to say that we don't "deserve" higher rates.  I am saying
that collectively, we don't demand higher rates.  Regardless of how some
individuals feel strongly on this issue, you have to admit that without a
constriction of supply, there's little hope for higher rates.
>
> BTW I assure you that the editors of S&T and Astronomy will see (or at
least hear about) this discussion thread...
> --
> Matt BenDaniel
> matt@starmatt.com
> http://starmatt.com
>
> --  APML Archives at <http://www.system.missouri.edu/apml/>  ---
>                 Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
>


--  APML Archives at <http://www.system.missouri.edu/apml/>  ---
                Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>