Thanks Stuart, I'm reprocessing it to try to even the background out
more. It looks too mottled to me right now.
Gary
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 2:14
PM
Subject: Re: [APML] Comet Bradfield
Revisited
Gary, both are very nice! That was a tough comet both because
it was always
pretty close to the sun and it had such a long thin tail. You
got it though!
Stuart Heggie
http://www.astrofoto.ca/stuartheggie
Flesherton,
Ontario, Canada
"Beauty in things exists in the mind that contemplates
them."
----- Original Message -----
From: "GARY HATFIELD" <Starmangmh@msn.com>
To: "APML"
<astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent:
Sunday, March 20, 2005 12:38 PM
Subject: [APML] Comet Bradfield
Revisited
Hello All,
While going through some
old slides I came across my only 2 shots of
Comet Bradfield from last
April. They weren't very good as it was my first
comet. Between
some morning clouds, being overexposed, and the glow of the
impending
sunrise, I hadn't been able to do much with them last year. I
put
them in PixInsight's DBE and was able to salvage them somewhat.
I'm still
trying to figure out the tolerance levels for DBE. Anyway,
it was
interesting to see the difference in the tail of Bradfield vs
Machholz.
Taken between 4:30-5:00 a.m. est on 4/29/04...
http://www.starryestateobservatory.com/My_Homepage_Files/Page1.html<http://www.starryestateobservatory.com/My_Homepage_Files/Page1.html>
Gary
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>
_______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing
list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
>
_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo
mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
|