RE: Fight! was RE: [APML] Images in Magazines (was Mirtle andGermanoinS&T)

["Loke Tan" <tan@cox.net>]

Hi,

 It seems like this has been brought up before. IMHO, If we're going to
discuss CCD images then we need a change of the rules. If not then it would
technically be Off Topic.

Loke


-----Original Message-----
From: astro-photo-bounces@seds.org
[mailto:astro-photo-bounces@seds.org]On Behalf Of Robert Reeves
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 9:26 PM
To: Discussion of Film Astrophotography
Subject: Re: Fight! was RE: [APML] Images in Magazines (was Mirtle and
GermanoinS&T)


> Robert, Chris is technically correct: By the rules
> you shouldn't be dicussing CCD images here. But if
> you can't do it, then I guess Tony Hallas can't do
> it either. And you've received very few compaints

I have no problems with an honest disagreement, but I have thought that we
are part of the more educated and civil part of the population, and that we
should act accordingly.

And to add fuel to the fire... I have no problem with Gendler's or Tony's
amazing CCD images shown here.  Yes, this is a film list, and for goodness
sake I wrote the curent book on film astrophotography, but the field is
evolving and the division between photons, electrons, silver, and silicon
grows more blurry every day.

My 2 cents... now back to CNN and the REAL war.

Robert Reeves                      reeves10@swbell.net
520 Rittiman Rd.                   www.robertreeves.com
San Antonio, Texas 78209    210-828-9036
USA                                     29.484  98.440  200 meters


_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo


_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo