Re: [APML] M42, yet another...

["Bobby Middleton" <bobm@koyote.com>]

Boy that's a big frame Steve! Nice shot with perfect guiding and focus as
the others have already mentioned, but I think they are right about there
being fainter detail that was clipped off by processing. Here's the $64
question: How was the vignetting compared to the Pentax? Any way you can
post a raw frame to show the vignetting?
Bobby Middleton

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve..." <swalters@att.net>
To: "APML" <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:44 PM
Subject: [APML] M42, yet another...


> After many moons of struggling with various problems and a new camera, I
> finally have a result to show. Yet another M42 for your bloodshot
> eyeballs......
>
> http://astrophoto.home.att.net/Images/M42-6x9.htm
>
> It's a big file.
>
> This was taken from New Jersey, the Light Pollution Capital of the
Universe,
> using my new Mitsuboshi 6x9 medium format camera and off axis guider on my
> Tak BRC-250 and MI-250 GEQ. Two 30 minute frames on E200, stacked, curved,
> unsharp masked and a slight increase in color saturation. No cropping was
> done at all.
>
> My Tak is begging to ride on an AP1200GTO but I am so far down the
> notification list that I think it may never see the day.....
>
> Steve...
>
> swalters@att.net
> http://Astrophoto.home.att.net
>
>
> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>