Re: [APML] Tech Pan exposure lengths...

["Jim Ives" <flyboy9990@earthlink.net>]

Thanks Joe,
    I'm still hoping to be able to test all this wonderful theory this
weekend! Should prove interesting. It's supposeto be in the low 20's but
clear. That's all the window I need!

Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph O'Neil" <joneil@multiboard.com>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: [APML] Tech Pan exposure lengths...


>
> >    Based on Chucks recommendation since I just have a small 2 reel tank
I'm
> >going to sit the tank down and spin it between my hands. I may invest in
one
> >of those rotary processors your talking about though.
>
> -snip-
>
> Hi Jim;
>          The other hand agitation technique is to shake the tank like you
> are making a Martini, (you know, 007 style, shaken, not stirred :).  This
> still means no inversion, but striaght up and down.
>          However, having tried that, and tried Chuck's way, I perfer
> Chuck's way.
>
>          Rotary is a good way to, because of the consistancy, but onc you
> go rotary, you have to cutbacka nd adust your processing times, as the
> constant motion really increases your contrast.  So you are teaching
> yourself all over again.  however, the consistancy with rotary processing
> is very nice.
> joe
>
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.oneilphoto.on.ca
> http://www.multiboard.com/~joneil
> "Una salus victus nullam sperare salutem"
>
>
> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>