[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] To push or not to push

To: astro-photo@seds.org
Subject: Re: [APML] To push or not to push
From: Herm <hermperez@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:00:41 -0500
In-Reply-To: <000c01c1caf1$871453f0$4be9fea9@Office>
References: <000c01c1caf1$871453f0$4be9fea9@Office>
Reply-To: astro-photo@seds.org
Sender: owner-astro-photo@seds.org

I have some close ups in my website at:
http://home.att.net/~hermperez/e200_push_processing_comparison.htm

this compares a +1 vs a +3 push (ignore the focus problem).. the conclusion is
that there is a slight increase in grain and a true increase in recording power.
Note that E200 pushed +3 to ASA1000 still has less grain than the usual ASA400
astro films that we use. I would not worry too much about grain with E200,
pushed or unpushed..

"Scott Hammonds" <capella@creatorsview.com>  wrote:

>After searching the archives for a while and re-reading Covingtons
>section on films, I'm trying to decide whether or not to push E200.
>Any thoughts? Comparison shots? 
>Thanks,
> 
>Scott Hammonds

Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez

--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [APML] To push or not to push
  - From: "Chris Schur" <cschur@cybertrails.com>
- Re: [APML] To push or not to push
  - From: "Tony Hallas" <tonyhallas@foothill.net>

References:
- [APML] To push or not to push
  - From: "Scott Hammonds" <capella@creatorsview.com>

Prev by Author: Re: [APML] R200SS was: 8" Reflector decent enough for prime focus AP?
Next by Author: Re: [APML] Hypered film effective duration
Prev by thread: RE: [APML] To push or not to push
Next by thread: Re: [APML] To push or not to push
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread