RE: [APML] Which Software for imageprocessing

["R. Scott Ireland" <ireland@gate.net>]

BTW, another option to consider is Photoshop Elements, which I believe goes
for around $100 instead of $600 for the full-blown version.

Most of the functional elements are the same in PSE, but it lacks some of
the more professional features, such as prepress/CMYK settings, etc.

Scott

website:  http://www.rsiphotos.com/
email:  ireland@gate.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-astro-photo@seds.org [mailto:owner-astro-photo@seds.org]On
> Behalf Of Stan Richard
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 10:30 AM
> To: astro-photo@seds.org
> Subject: Re: [APML] Which Software for imageprocessing
>
>
> Stefan, PW gets my vote but then I don't do much registration but what I
> have done seems to work well.  PW is so much more user-friendly
> than PS and
> much cheaper, IMHO.  If you want to spend several years learning
> how to use
> your software, then go for PS.  My 2 cents worth.
>
> Stan Richard
>
>
>
>
> >From: stefan.beck@voba-schoenbuch.de
> >Reply-To: astro-photo@seds.org
> >To: "        -         *astro-photo@seds.org" <astro-photo@seds.org>
> >Subject: [APML] Which Software for imageprocessing
> >Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:45:19 +0100
> >
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >which software do you use for imageprocessing, calibrating,enhancing,
> >adding...
> >
> >I'm just thinking about purchasing one.
> >
> >I heard from Picure Window, Astroart, Registar. What do you prefer ?
> >
> >Stefan Beck
> >
> >--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
> >              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
>
>
> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>