Re: [APML] Which Software for imageprocessing

["Stan Richard" <stanrichard@hotmail.com>]

Stefan, PW gets my vote but then I don't do much registration but what I 
have done seems to work well.  PW is so much more user-friendly than PS and 
much cheaper, IMHO.  If you want to spend several years learning how to use 
your software, then go for PS.  My 2 cents worth.

Stan Richard




>From: stefan.beck@voba-schoenbuch.de
>Reply-To: astro-photo@seds.org
>To: "        -         *astro-photo@seds.org" <astro-photo@seds.org>
>Subject: [APML] Which Software for imageprocessing
>Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:45:19 +0100
>
>
>Hi,
>
>which software do you use for imageprocessing, calibrating,enhancing,
>adding...
>
>I'm just thinking about purchasing one.
>
>I heard from Picure Window, Astroart, Registar. What do you prefer ?
>
>Stefan Beck
>
>--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>


_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>