[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APML] The Glory of Rho
Hi Wade,
45N will be tough but your site looks to be inky black. If you get a good
night with excellent trans, you should be able to pull it off, no problem.
Your exposures at f/4 sound correct.
Btw, I darkened the Rho shot just a hair. Hit reload and take a look. It
was so slight though, it may not be that noticeable on other monitors
without a side by side comparison.
http://www.abmedia.com/astro/current/Rho-Region.html
Chris
-----------------------------
Chris Cook Photography
www.cookphoto.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas W. Earle" <twade@bmi.net>
To: "'Discussion of Film Astrophotography'" <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 4:55 PM
Subject: RE: [APML] The Glory of Rho
> Chris,
>
> Yet, another excellent image from your trip to NM.
>
> I hope to capture Rho with my Pentax 300mm EDIF F/4.0 lens this
> upcoming New Moon. I'll be using E200 too since it surprisingly
> recorded the blue spectrum quite nicely under your very dark sky.
> It's definitely a challenge capturing these southern objects from
> 45N. We only have 3-3.5 hours of total darkness this time of year.
> I feel for those that are even farther north. Despite having some
> of the darkest skies in the continental US, Mother Nature doesn't
> allow many "cloud free" opportunities this far north, especially
> during New Moon. Just this past New Moon, I sure was wishing I
> still lived in West Texas. The Water Vapor was red the entire New
> Moon window which means excellent transparency. I had to battle
> high clouds the whole time. I did try capturing Rho with Provia
> 100F pushed 1 stop. I exposed it for 75 minutes. I initially was
> going to go for 90 minutes but I knew I didn't have good enough
> polar alignment judging from the corrections the STV was making.
> Albeit, I'm not certain if it was poor polar alignment or the gusty
> wind causing the corrections. It was a bad night anyway with 15-25
> mph winds and patchy cirrus. I'll get them developed this upcoming
> week. If I have any images worth publishing, they'll be ready for
> viewing late July.
>
> It still floors me that you are able to expose for 40 minutes at
> F/2.8. Using Michael Covington's Astrophotography Calculator, it
> shows the maximum exposure (i.e. sky fog limit) for your setup is 45
> minutes. Since I'll be shooting at F/4 and pushing E200 a full stop
> I figure my limit is probably around 75 minutes. As a result, I'll
> take two shots of Rho Ophiuchi: one 60 minute and one 75 minute.
>
> Again, thanks for sharing your excellent images over the past week.
>
> Wade
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
>
>
_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo