Re: [APML] Fw: images

[Chris Schur <comets133@yahoo.com>]

Chris, 

this is a tough transition time for all of us, Any
posts of CCD processing tips can help all of us,
including the film users.  If the group has no problem
with this type of post, then Im all for it.  After
all, my film scanner is just another type of CCD
camera.

Chris Schur

--- Chris Cook <ccjd@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> I agree Tony.
> 
> I think the "no CCD on the APML" discussions are
> total crap.  It is fricking
> old and it is wicked boring.  I am one of the old
> film guys but ya know
> what, I saw the light quite a while ago and it ain't
> gonna be on film much
> longer.
> 
> I welcome CCD posts, DSLR posts, digicam posts,
> webcam posts etc........ on
> the APML.  I don't really care what type of "sensor"
> the image was captured
> on.  I wish people would get over this film only
> APML list BS.  If you are
> that emulsion pure, then you should not be using a
> computer, Photoshop,
> MaxIm, Registar, PW, etc etc, etc.. and there is to
> be no scanning of your
> film either since you are using a CCD to capture the
> image!  Let's see, I
> think that leaves about 1 or 2 people in the world
> who still use a chemical
> darkroom for astrophotography, oh wait, if you put
> the image on a website,
> it must have been scanned using that awful thing
> called a CCD.
> 
> Chris
> 
> Btw, I think Chris was just stating the known facts
> here on the APML.  I
> don't falut him for informing Gerald.
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------
> Chris Cook
> Astronomical & Nightscape Photography
> www.abmedia.com/astro
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Tony Hallas" <tonyhallas@foothill.net>
> To: "Discussion of Film Astrophotography"
> <astro-photo@seds.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 2:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [APML] Fw: images
> 
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> >     I am really, really surprised that someone as
> well rounded as Chris
> > would make a comment like that ... no kidding ...
> this list went around
> and
> > around on this subject matter ... and my only
> comment now is how in the
> heck
> > are you ever going to become aware of what is
> possible with the new
> > technologies if you don't see samples of it, or
> dabble in it yourself? OK
> > ... this list is film only ... I respect that ...
> I won't post any more
> CCD
> > images here ... in fact I won't post anything here
> anymore. By your own
> > actions, you have become defunct. Astrophotography
> is now a mixture of
> film
> > and CCD ...  I can't subscribe to a list that
> considers progress to be
> > something unacceptable ... I won't limit myself
> ... why should you? How
> sad
> > ...
> >
> >        Tony
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Astro-Photo mailing list
> > Astro-Photo@seds.org
> > http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
> 



	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo