Re: [APML] Centuria 400 - Photographic Results II

[Tim Povlick <potentate@san.rr.com>]

Chris Schur wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>  
>
Hey!

>I cant believe the number of hours Ive spent on testing this film, I hope
>its appreciated!
>
It sure is.

>  Anyway, here is the tracked telephoto tests from dark sky
>sites for your evaluation.  At this point, I am not impressed with the film
>for wide angle,
>

It doesn't look to bad to me.  Am I missing something?


> and its green response tends to dilute the red sensitivity.
>There are major quality issues with this film as you will see, each roll
>varied alot, and the color balance changed from roll to roll.  Here are the
>results of many hours of work:
>
>  
>
This reminds me of how Fuji NGH-II- / 800 reacts. 

>http://www.psiaz.com/schur/astro/filmimagepages/kontests2.html
>
>
>Comments Appreciated!
>
>  
>
I liked the results myself, but I'll leave it to you experts out here to 
decide. 

In medium format what film is left?

TechPan (hypered)
Kodak E200
Fuji Provia
???

___
Tim

>Clear Skies,
>
>Chris Schur
>Astro: http://www.PSIAZ.com/Schur/astro
>Robotics: http://www.psiaz.com/schur/astro/roboticsmain.html
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo