[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

RE: [APML] O.T.: batch conversion of Tiff to JPG




Yea, I don't like them either, but for what Michael wants them for, I think 
it's fine.  I plan on doing something similar, so that I can archive a 
whole library on just a couple of disks and then put them in widely 
separated geographical locations as a last-resort emergency backup.

If you save the image at a setting of 10, 11 or 12 in Photoshop, you will 
be hard pressed to see any perceptible difference, even if you look at the 
image at 200 percent enlargement.

Jerry

At 11:48 AM 6/12/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>Agreed.  I'd guess that 2:1 is probably the best you could average, tho'
>astro images having a predominantly black background might do a little
>better.
>
>But, you guys keep digging new galaxies out of the darkness, you're not
>leaving much black background.
>
>I still don't like lossy compression that adds artifacts to my images!  8-)

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo