RE: [APML] ESO Tarantula CCD image

["Chris Schur" <cschur@cybertrails.com>]

Jerry, you may be partially right.  My thougths are the method may be much
more effective for CCD data becuase it has a higher dynamic range than film,
and is more uniform.  For film, it could be a trade off on the contrast due
to random clumping of the grains in the chrominance data.

Chris Schur

Astrophotography: http://www.psiaz.com/schur/astro/index.html


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-astro-photo@seds.org [mailto:owner-astro-photo@seds.org]On
Behalf Of Jerry Lodriguss
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 12:51 PM
To: astro-photo@seds.org
Subject: RE: [APML] ESO Tarantula CCD image


At 12:44 PM 6/17/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Jerry, Outstanding, now you have a new tool to bring those deep astroimages
>to life!


Hi Chris,

I'm not convinced.  I'm leaning back to thinking the gains are a trade off
for contrast in the object.

Jerry

Astronomical photography: http://www.astropix.com



--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>