Re: [APML] PMZ

["Bobby Middleton" <bobm@koyote.com>]

Stosh, you'll find that PMZ is a bit more sensitive (faster) than PPF or PJ;
maybe 1.25x faster. Somewhere around 1 hour exposure time it begins to start
some color shifting but it's not bad so don't worry too much about that. It
would be THE color astro film if it wasn't for its grain but sometimes that
is very managable.........sometimes not.
Good luck,
Bobby Middleton

http://www.koyote.com/users/bobm/word.htm
----- Original Message -----
From: Stosh <stosh@ptd.net>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2000 7:20 AM
Subject: [APML] PMZ


> Greetings,
> The weather looks like it will cooperate for a night of shooting at our
dark
> site and I wanted to take a stab at the veil.  From the recent mentions of
PMZ
> having the spectral response to handle such a task, I wanted to ask some
help
> from somebody who's used this stuff.
>
> Could anyone compare it to another film I'm familiar with like PPF, PJ400,
or
> E200?  The fast 1000 ISO number got me a little nervous, but maybe it has
no
> real effect on long exposures.  I'm not looking for an actual exposure
time from
> anyone, but a comparison to another film based on optimum exposures for
detail
> vs. sky fog.
>
> I'm leaving in about 6 hours so if anyone could respond ASAP, I'd really
> appreciate it.  And for that matter, folks in PA, NJ, and NY are invited
to
> Cherry Springs tonight.
>
> thanks,
> Stosh
>
> --  APML Archives at <http://www.system.missouri.edu/apml/>  ---
>                 Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>


--  APML Archives at <http://www.system.missouri.edu/apml/>  ---
                Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>