[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APML]: ST-4 v. 201xt Saga
The Astro-Photography Mailing List
------------------------------------
Robert Hoyle wrote:
> I keep reading that from others, too. Can't understand it. I do mostly prime-focus
> stuff through an OAG -- and the stars are definitely "sea-gulls" -- *never* had a
> guiding problem with these on the 201xt, tho. Wonder why? Did you see my post to Rod
> M. about this, today? Had some references in the APML Archives to the same problem
> you had -- and I wondered aloud if maybe these were "older" model 201xt's, and maybe
> Meade's fixed this problem now? Dunno. Wonder if it's my Taurus OAG? It's a great
> unit -- but so is the CEG, etc.
>
> Good Luck to you too.
>
> Rx.
More power to ya'! :) Mine was bought about 1.5 years ago. Maybe the
Taurus yields better stars. Heck I dunno. Well if yours works well, I'd
run with it!
Good continued sucess! Hope the ST4 provides me with the same.
Rick