[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML]: ST-4 v. 201xt Saga



The Astro-Photography Mailing List
------------------------------------

Robert Hoyle wrote:

> I keep reading that from others, too.  Can't understand it.  I do mostly prime-focus
> stuff through an OAG -- and the stars are definitely "sea-gulls" -- *never* had a
> guiding problem with these on the 201xt, tho.  Wonder why?  Did you see my post to Rod
> M. about this, today?  Had some references in the APML Archives to the same problem
> you had -- and I wondered aloud if maybe these were "older" model 201xt's, and maybe
> Meade's fixed this problem now?  Dunno.  Wonder if it's my Taurus OAG?  It's a great
> unit -- but so is the CEG, etc.
> 
> Good Luck to you too.
> 
> Rx.

More power to ya'! :) Mine was bought about 1.5 years ago. Maybe the
Taurus yields better stars. Heck I dunno.  Well if yours works well, I'd
run with it!

Good continued sucess! Hope the ST4 provides me with the same.
Rick