[APML] M11 posted

[Alan Voetsch <alanv12952@yahoo.com>]

All,

Got some results scanned from earlier this month. M11 was nice and easy
so it goes up first. Information is with the shot. I've found that I
get better results if I keep processing to a minimum on clusters, so
this has a very light processing touch applied.

http://www.pbase.com/image/34098310

Due to some prior conversations here (APML), I double scanned each
negative or positive (I also had the negatives mounted in slide
mounts). Then each matching pair of scans (I used two different films
for each shot I'll be posting, Fuji SHQ200 and Kodak E200) was
'average' combined in Registar. So now you know what I've doing ALL day
today. 8-)

Personally, I didn't notice much difference between those and the
single scans. I don't think I have the patience to run it through 4, or
8 times, so I compromised and did it twice. I'd be interested in any
more comments along those lines.

Alan

SCT Astrophotography: http://www.pbase.com/avoetsch/astrophotography
FS-102 G-11/Gemini: http://www.pbase.com/avoetsch12952/tak_fs102
& http://www.pbase.com/avoetsch12952/fs102
& http://www.pbase.com/avoetsch12952/takpf


		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 
_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo