Re: [APML] Beginner scanner images

[steve banbury <banburys@sonic.net>]

Thanks Jim Ives and Jeff Ball!

I'm not sure how to post the raw scans--they're something like 50 meg files
and even people not ordinarily "bandwidth challenged"
will choke!! Whats a good way to do it?

Steve

Jeff Ball wrote:

> Hello Steve,
> The processing looks a little dark to me.  The transition from
> highlights to shadows seems to be abrupt.  I don't know if this is in
> the scan or in the processing.  I am thinking you have a lot of info on
> the negatives with the optics/exposure/film you used.  Can you post the
> raw scans so we can see how that looks?  Thanks.
>
> Jeff Ball
> www.astro-photography.com
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: astro-photo-bounces@seds.org
> [mailto:astro-photo-bounces@seds.org]
> > On Behalf Of steve banbury
> > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:48 AM
> > To: APML
> > Subject: [APML] Beginner scanner images
> >
> > I've posted some shots taken last new moon and scanned with a newly
> > acquired Scan Dual III at:
> >
> > www.sonic.net/~banburys/June30,2003/
> >
> > Constructive comments would be appreciated.
> > Go easy on me guys--this is my first attempt at film scanning and even
> > with Jerry L's CD I found scanning a negative  to be a real challenge!
> >
> > :^} Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo