RE: [APML] Virus with APML subject recieved...

["Gene Horr" <genehorr@houston.rr.com>]

FWIW I didn't see it come through on my computer.  It is
possible, but highly unlikely to come through the list.
Only if the virus is very small could it get through.

Gene Horr
genehorr@houston.rr.com


-----Original Message-----
From: astro-photo-bounces@seds.org
[mailto:astro-photo-bounces@seds.org]On Behalf Of Kevin Wigell
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 4:15 PM
To: Discussion of Film Astrophotography
Subject: Re: [APML] Virus with APML subject recieved...


So does this mean that a virus was blasted at every APML member? I thought
that wasn't supposed to be possible? I got it too, only Roadrunner got to it
first.

Or was it sent directly to list members from someone's (Jeff Crilly?)
computer because those names were in his address book?

Kevin Wigell

----- Original Message -----
From: <astropix@att.net>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 13:29
Subject: [APML] Virus with APML subject recieved...


> Hey All...
>
>      No hoax here... my 'Brightmail' AV (Norton's)... which is on AT&T
servers,
> stopped it in it's tracks. The subject line read: 'Re: [APML] Question re
> efficient use of film vs Quality'
>
>      The mail *said* it was from Jeff Crilly... I've included the expanded
> header info for you real computer sleuths to have a look at... all info
> available below:                            Geoff Powers



_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo