Re: [APML] M74: CCDsharp vs AIP deconvolution comparison

["Mike Cook, AF9Y" <mwcook@concentric.net>]

Robert,

   Although CCDsharp is a little better, the AIP LR can be made to look
the same by applying an Unsharp Mask at 100%, 2 R and 2 T.  Both images
might also benefit from some masked processing tailored for just the bright
center of the galaxy.  Rank order processing might produce some extra
detail for that area.

   As always, a beautiful image.

Mike Cook
AF9Y

From:           	"Robert Gendler" <robgendler@worldnet.att.net>
To:             	<astro-photo@seds.org>
Subject:        	[APML] M74: CCDsharp vs AIP deconvolution comparison
Date sent:      	Tue, 2 Jul 2002 06:36:54 -0400
Send reply to:  	astro-photo@seds.org

> Hello All, my introductionIf anyone's interested another CCDsharp-AIP LR comparison
> The latest image:10 iterations CCDsharp
> http://www.robgendlerastropics.com/M74.html
> The old image :100 iterations LR in AIP
> http://www.robgendlerastropics.com/M74Brandnew.jpg
> 
> Rob Gendler
> Email: robgendler@att.net
> Web site: http://www.robgendlerastropics.com/
> 
> 



Mike Cook, AF9Y
http://www.af9y.com
mwcook@cris.com




--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>