[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML]: SprintScan 35




Chuck Vaughn wrote:
> 
> 
> I think this is a good idea as we have no basis for comparison
> now. At least in regards to dynamic range, a dense Tech Pan
> negative would be a good test for scanners. Most color astro
> negatives are quite thin and easily handled by scanners.
> 
> I will look through my negatives and see if I have a dense
> negative that I wouldn't mind parting with. From APML I can get
> some volunteers to scan the negative and each person could
> mail it to the next person. A requirement to be on the list would
> be you must have a web or ftp site to upload the image so we can all
> look at it.
> 
> I'll post something about this later when I find a negative.
> 

I would certainly be glad to participate in such a round-robin of a
negative passing. Of course, if I get my hands on a Chuck Vaughn
negative, I may not wish to pass it on to someone else! <G> Just
kidding. I am very curious as to what Chuck thinks is a dense Tech Pan
negative.

-- 
Clear skies,
Steve Bell
email: sb635@delphi.com
Astrophoto page: http://www.mindspring.com/~sb635