[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APML]: What is Adaptive Optics?
> therefore, I would call this "active" optics and not "adaptive" optics?
> I would think that "adaptive" refers to an actual physical deformation
> of the shape of some imaging surface, while "active" refers to a shift
> in orientation of some refective mirror, like the "adaptive optics"
> (really "active") as offered by SBIG?
There seem to be many definitions being tossed around at the moment
relating to active and adaptive optics. While I have at times gotten
testy with various uses of the words folks use, I have started to
apply my own loose definition. If the "system" provides a factor of
10 improvement in the seeing, ie from 1 arcsecond to 0.1 arcsecond or
better, I call it a "good adaptive optics" system, if it does not I
call it a "poor adaptive optics" system. At this point folks who are
offering tip/tilt correctors will often point out that there system
is actually really good for an active optics system.
One should also worry about strell ratio improvements but that is
another aspect of the story.
Cheers,
Scott
---------------
Dr. Scott Teare
University of Illinois and Mt. Wilson Observatory
Mt Wilson, California.