Re: [APML]FIlm Test - Ilford SFX200

["Bobby Middleton" <bobm@koyote.com>]

Nice TP shot Bill. Looks like the illford never came to life. Unhypered TP
would probably be close to that too though.
Bobby Middleton

----- Original Message -----
From: "William R. Mattil" <wrmattil@ix.netcom.com>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:00 PM
Subject: [APML]FIlm Test - Ilford SFX200


> Gentlemen,
>
> There was some discussion regarding the suitability of Ilford SFX200 for
> Astro-Photography. I just happened to have a roll of SFX200 so while
> imaging last night I slapped the roll in and exposed a shot just to see.
> The results of this test can be viewed at:
>
> http://www.celestial-images.com/film-test.html
>
> This test compares Hypered Tech Pan,thats all I had handy, with
> unhypered SFX200. Same subject, OTA, Exposure etc etc.
>
> Rosette Nebula in Monoceros
> 253mm f/4 Newtonian. Lumicon Coma Corrrector and Ha Filter
> Guided Off-Axis with the ubiqitious ST-4
>
> Exposure times are 45 minutes each. (Lumicon Ha filter in place)
>
> Development: Tech Pan - 6 min D-19
> Development: Ilford - 6 min Tmax (their recomendation)
>
> Both negatives scanned @ 4000 dpi, 16 bits greyscale. Imported into
> Photoshop. These are full size scans. No scropping, no levels, no curves
> .... no hits no runs, and no errors :^) What you see here is what you
> get.
>
> Regards
>
> Bill
>
> --
> William R. Mattil |
> wrmattil@ix.netcom.com | http://celestial-images.com
> (972) 399-4106 |
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo