Re: [APML] A rough comparison

[stephen pitt <lthuedk@pe.net>]

steve banbury wrote:
> 
> stephen pitt wrote:
> 
>> Thank you Steve.  It might have looked better if it went up her nose.
>>
> Hi Stephen--As my nine year-old would say "eeew!!"
> On a serious note, it would seem like the streak must have been in only 
> one of the multiple exposures you took, right?

Yes, it was on one frame only.

> 
> With all the great results I'm seeing these days, I definitely being 
> pulled in the direction of a Canon camera instead of a CCD.
> It seems like the Canon outperforms any CCD available in even remotely 
> the same price range!
> Take care--Steve

With the instant gratification and shot analysis available, it has 
definitely become a different game.  To actually see the Witch Head in 
only six minutes is something.  But, there are downsides.

There's lots of processing, amplifier glow, and the need for dark 
frames-particularly in the warmer months.

Like anything else, the processing part becomes routine.  And, as a 
filmer, you're already ahead of the game in your manipulative skills 
which are similarly applied.

Stephen
=================

> 
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo